Raggow v Scougall is a case which is not rarely cited but this case is only cited for the attack on the decision of Stilk v Myrick, now lets see what happened in this case
Facts of Raggow v Scougall
The claimant was employed by the defendants for a period of two years at a certain salary. During the period of contract, war broke out and the defendant’s buisness was detrimentally affected. Rather than clossing the buisness the parties entered into a new agreement under which the claimant agreed to accept a lower salary, until the end of war, when the orignal agreement would be revived .
The claimant accepted the reduced rate, arguing that the defendants had provided no consideration for his promise to accept a lower salary
Darling J held that the agreement was supposed by consideration and the action therefore failed. He held that the parties had in fact torn up the old agreement and made a new one by mutual consent , and stated that he was glad to be able to arrive at this conclusion because the claimant was seeking to do a very dishonest thing.
- If you want facts like these of any case you can request us by clicking here
- We also provide first class law assignment writing service do check it here
- And very soon we are going to launch first class law notes
William v Roffey