Hanson v Royden and its importance with Stilk V Myrick

  • by

This case is concerned with the “Existing legal duty is not good consideration” in the consideration chapter of contract law

Facts of Hanson v Royden

The claimant was a seamen, And he had done job for of the second mate for the defendant. So the defendant promoted him to Second mate. This case is used for the crticism of stilk v myrick as here the claimant did more of what he was obiged to do under the contract and it was considered a good consideration.

But in stilk v myrick the claimant did more than he was obliged to do but the courts said that there was no consideration

Related readings

Stilk V Myrick

Raggow v Scougall

Hartley v Ponsonby

William v Roffey

The Eurymedon